The Institute of Canine Biology
  • HOME
  • Blog
  • Breed Preservation
    • Breeding for the future >
      • BFF Breed Groups
    • Breed Status
    • The "Elevator Pitch"
    • What's in the Gene Pool?
    • What population genetics can tell us about a breed
    • What population genetics can tell you...Tollers & Heelers
    • How to use kinship data
    • Using EBVs to breed better dogs >
      • How population size affects inbreeding
      • EBV Examples
    • How to read a dendrogram
    • Global Pedigree Project >
      • The Database
    • Finding the genes without DNA
    • How to read a heat map
  • Courses
    • COI BootCamp (FREE!)
    • Managing Genetics For the Future Open Reg (Open Reg) >
      • Syllabus - Managing Genetics for the Future
    • ICB Golden Retriever Breed Workshop
    • Minicourse: Preserve Genes To Preserve Breeds
    • Basic Population Genetics (FREE)
    • Genetic rescue: the genetics of cross breeding (NEW!)
    • The Biology of Dogs (Open Reg )
    • Genetics of Behavior & Performance (Open Reg)
    • Strategies for Preservation Breeding
    • DNA For Dog Breeders (May2025) >
      • DNA For Dog Breeders (Open Reg)
    • Understanding Hip & Elbow Dysplasia (Open Reg) >
      • MORE FREE COURSES >
        • Quickie Genetics (Free!)
        • Group Discounts
        • Useful Genetics (Free!)
        • Strategies for Preservation Breeding (Sept 2023) >
          • Heredity & Genetics (Free!)
        • Basic Genetics Videos
  • Health Data
    • Bloat (Purdue Study)
    • Body Condition Score >
      • % Dysplastic vs BCS
    • Breed Comparions
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Cataracts
    • Caesareans
    • Deafness
    • Degenerative Myelopathy
    • Elbow Dysplasia
    • Epilepsy
    • Genetic Diversity
    • Genetic Diversity (MyDogDNA)
    • Hip Dysplasia >
      • Hip Dysplasia (Hou et al 2013)
    • Metabolic
    • Inbreeding Effects
    • Inbreeding (Gubbels)
    • Inbreeding (Dreger)
    • Lifespan
    • Litter size
    • mtDNA
    • Orthopedic
    • Mode of Inheritance
    • Patella Luxation
    • Thyroid
    • Portosystemic shunt
    • Purebred vs Mixed (UC Davis)
    • Purebred vs Mixed Breed (Bonnett)
    • Spay & Neuter Effects
    • Calboli et al 2008
    • Hodgman (1963)
    • Scott & Fuller (1965)
    • Stockard: Purebred crosses
    • Summers (2011)
  • Resources
    • Stud Books >
      • American Kennel Club stud books
      • Field Dog stud books
      • The Kennel Club (UK)
    • Genetics Databases
    • Learn
    • Videos about dog genetics
    • The Amazing Things Dogs Do! (videos) >
      • Livestock Management
      • Livestock guarding
      • Transportation, exploration, racing
      • Conservation & wildlife management
      • Detection Dogs
      • Medicine & Research
      • Entertainment
      • AKC/CHF Podcasts
    • Read & Watch
    • Bookshelf
  • Projects
    • How To Interpret Breed Analyses
    • Ilska et al 2025 Figures >
      • # of dogs whole pedigree (Ilska)
      • Percent of Dogs Bred (LReg 2005-15)
      • % Males Bred
      • Imported Sires
      • Proportional Population Growth
    • Afghan Hound
    • More details about the Toller study
    • Belgian Tervuren >
      • Belgian Terv p2
      • Belgians- why population size matters
    • Bernese Mountain Dog
    • Boxer
    • Brussels Griffon
    • Bullmastiff
    • Canaan Dog >
      • Canaan analyses
    • Cesky Terrier >
      • Cesky genetic history
    • Chinook
    • Curly-coated Retriever
    • Doberman
    • Entelbucher Mountain Dog
    • Flatcoat Retriever
    • French Bulldog
    • German Shorthair
    • Golden Retriever >
      • Golden Retriever Pedigree Charts
    • Irish Water Spaniel >
      • IWS (6 Nov 17)
    • Labrador Retriever
    • Manchester Terrier
    • Mongolian Bankhar >
      • Research Updates
      • Bankhar 1
    • Norwegian Lundehund
    • Plummer Terrier
    • Otterhound
    • Portuguese Water Dog >
      • Portuguese Water Dog (pt 2)
    • Ridgeback
    • Schipperke
    • Standard Poodle >
      • The Problem With Poodles
      • 3poodle pedigree charts
      • 3Poodle Wycliff dogs
      • Poodle Genetics
    • Tibetan Spaniel
    • Tibetan Mastiff
    • West Highland White Terrier
    • Whippet
    • Wirehaired Pointing Griffons
    • UK KC Graphs >
      • UK KC Breed Status
      • UK Groups
      • KC Gundogs
      • KC Hounds
      • KC Terriers >
        • Terriers (select breeds)
      • KC Pastoral
      • KC Toys
      • KC Working
      • KC Utility
      • Australian KC
  • Genetics
    • Genetic Status of UK KC Breeds (2015)
    • Heterozygosity (DNA) >
      • Heterozygosity vs COI
      • Heterozygosity
      • High and Low Heterozygosity
      • Heterozygosity Countries
      • Heterozygosity by Breed
      • EU Breed Skull Restrictions
    • Mortality (Lewis et al 2018)

Finding the genes for a genetic disorder without DNA

1/7/2026

 
By Carol Beuchat PhD
Commercial DNA analysis has changed the way we breed dogs, giving us the ability to prevent disorders caused by recessive mutations with just a cheek swab. It has been less successful at addressing polygenic disorders. Identifying 12 genes "associated" with a health issue, with none identified as directly causal, poses a selection nightmare for breeders. What if your bitch has 4 of them and a potential mate has numerous others? What is the risk of producing puppies with problems? Can you discard all dogs with any of the genes, or even some of them, from the breeding program?
This is becoming a huge problems. Many breeds are wrestling with disorders that seem to be genetic because they run in breeds or families, but breeders can only guess at levels or risk involved in breeding a pair of dogs. Without some way to shed light on the underlying genetics of a probem, breeders have to weigh personal responsibility for health outcomes without useful information about risk. 
Several years ago, I wrote a blog post that described a way for breeders to deal with genetic disorders when nothing was known about the genes involved or mode or inheritance (Cool tricks with Kinship Coefficients, part 3: "How can I manage a disease without a DNA test?" ). In the past, the technique has been used to address several othewise intractable genetic problems in dogs, but it seems to be forgotton now that we look to DNA analysis to address genetic problems.

Recently, I was asked by some breeders of Yorkshire Terriers in Norway to see if I could help with the problem of liver shunts in this breed, and I decided to see if I could shed some light on the genetic basis of the problem using this technique.
The analysis uses a statistic computed from population genetics called the kinship coefficient, which quantifies the degree of relatedness between two dogs, assessed either from pedigree data or DNA. For a male and female, you determine the kinship coefficient for the pair, and that value is equal to the expected average coefficient of inbreeding in their puppies. This works because the kinship coefficient compares the genetic makeup of the sire and dam, then uses their genetic similarity (i.e., their relatedness) to estimate the degree of inbreeding if their genes were combined to produce puppies. In fact, this is how predicted litter COI is estimated in software that does test matings. 
So we have a statistic, the kinship coefficient, that allows us to assess the genetic similarity of two dogs. If you have a dog with a health issue (or any trait for that matter) that is suspected to be genetic, you would expect the dogs that are genetically similar to your dog would be more likely to carry the genes for the trait than dogs that were less similar. If you wanted to choose a mate that is less likely to carry the genes responsible for the health problem in your dog, you would look for individuals that are less similar genetically.
This seems logical enough, but how does this actually identify the dogs you could breed with that would have a lower risk of producing the disease? First, we need to identify as many dogs as we can that have been identified with the disorder, and we need the pedigree ancestry of these individuals. For a dog that has been diagnosed with the disorder, we know that it carries the risk genes that were inherited from its parents. This allows us to identify carriers of the risk genes, even though they are not affected and we don't know which specific genes are involved. 
Armed with the pedigree information for affected dogs in Norway, I performed a "cluster analysis" that identifies groups of closely related dogs using a "family tree" called a dendrogram, which is a visualization of the genetic reationships among groups of dogs. When I superimposed the information about affected Yorkies on the dendrogram, they all clustered in one group of relatives and there were none anywhere else among less related dogs.
​
Picture

​What we have done is identify the dogs that carry the genes that produce liver shunt in Yorkies without knowing what those genes are. Breeding together two dogs from that same cluster of related dogs would increase the risk of producing puppies with liver shunt; breeders can reduce risk by simply avoiding those pairings. In fact, here is where the kinship coefficient between your bitch and a sire would tell you how similar they are genetically. You than reduce risk by finding a pairing with a lower kinship coefficient. 
This almost seems magical, but it's a very powerful technique. We have no easy way to breed for or against polygenic disorders or traits using DNA data, and staring at a pile of pedigrees doesn't tell a breeder much about risks in a quantitative way. But we know that the degree of genetic similarity of a pair of dogs will depend on how closely related they are. Just as we can use kinship coefficients to predict the average inbreeding of a litter of puppies, we can use them to evaluate risk of a genetic disorder.
The clever thing about this type of analysis is that it can be used for any trait with a genetic basis. It will work better when the heritability of the trait or disorder is high; that is, when most of the variation in the trait is due to genetics, and relatively less is a consequence of environmental (non-genetic) factors. In either case, it is a way of addressing genetic issues that are complex, involving both genes and environment. Most breeds have some issue that they are trying to deal with by selective breeding, but without any useful genetic information except knowing individuals that are actually affected. This is a way to address those problems.
We don't need DNA data to solve every genetic problem. Back before DNA analysis was available, breeders worked out ways to provide information about genetic risks knowing only about affected dogs and their relatives. Today, many breeds are struggling to manage health issues. Breeders should be aware that tools are available to help map a genetic landscape that seems to have no useful landmarks. 

You can learn more about the genetics of dogs in ICB's Online Courses.

***   Population Genetics for Dog Breeders  ***

Visit our Facebook Groups

ICB Institute of Canine Biology
...the latest canine news and research

ICB Breeding for the Future
...the science of animal breeding ​​

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    January 2030
    January 2026
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    July 2023
    April 2023
    November 2022
    July 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    December 2020
    January 2020
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    October 2017
    August 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    July 2013
    March 2013
    July 2012
    April 2012

    Categories

    All
    Behavior
    Border-collie
    Herding

Blog

News


About Us

Contact Us








Copyright © 2012-2017 Institute of Canine Biology
Picture
Picture