The Institute of Canine Biology
  • HOME
  • Blog
  • Breed Preservation
    • Breeding for the future >
      • BFF Breed Groups
    • Breed Status
    • The "Elevator Pitch"
    • What's in the Gene Pool?
    • What population genetics can tell us about a breed
    • What population genetics can tell you...Tollers & Heelers
    • How to use kinship data
    • Using EBVs to breed better dogs >
      • How population size affects inbreeding
      • EBV Examples
    • How to read a dendrogram
    • Global Pedigree Project >
      • The Database
    • Finding the genes without DNA
    • How to read a heat map
  • Courses
    • COI BootCamp (FREE!)
    • Basic Population Genetics (FREE)
    • Genetic rescue: the genetics of cross breeding (NEW!)
    • The Biology of Dogs (Open Reg )
    • Managing Genetics For the Future >
      • Managing Genetics For the Future Open Reg (Open Reg) >
        • Syllabus - Managing Genetics for the Future
    • Genetics of Behavior & Performance (Open Reg)
    • Strategies for Preservation Breeding (Open Reg)
    • DNA For Dog Breeders (May2025) >
      • DNA For Dog Breeders (Open Reg)
    • Understanding Hip & Elbow Dysplasia (Open Reg) >
      • MORE FREE COURSES >
        • Quickie Genetics (Free!)
        • Group Discounts
        • Useful Genetics (Free!)
        • Strategies for Preservation Breeding (Sept 2023) >
          • Heredity & Genetics (Free!)
        • Basic Genetics Videos
  • Health Data
    • Bloat (Purdue Study)
    • Body Condition Score >
      • % Dysplastic vs BCS
    • Breed Comparions
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Cataracts
    • Caesareans
    • Deafness
    • Degenerative Myelopathy
    • Elbow Dysplasia
    • Epilepsy
    • Genetic Diversity
    • Genetic Diversity (MyDogDNA)
    • Hip Dysplasia >
      • Hip Dysplasia (Hou et al 2013)
    • Metabolic
    • Inbreeding Effects
    • Inbreeding (Gubbels)
    • Inbreeding (Dreger)
    • Lifespan
    • Litter size
    • mtDNA
    • Orthopedic
    • Mode of Inheritance
    • Patella Luxation
    • Thyroid
    • Portosystemic shunt
    • Purebred vs Mixed (UC Davis)
    • Purebred vs Mixed Breed (Bonnett)
    • Spay & Neuter Effects
    • Calboli et al 2008
    • Hodgman (1963)
    • Scott & Fuller (1965)
    • Stockard: Purebred crosses
    • Summers (2011)
  • Projects
    • How To Interpret Breed Analyses
    • Afghan Hound
    • More details about the Toller study
    • Belgian Tervuren >
      • Belgian Terv p2
      • Belgians- why population size matters
    • Bernese Mountain Dog
    • Boxer
    • Brussels Griffon
    • Bullmastiff
    • Canaan Dog >
      • Canaan analyses
    • Cesky Terrier >
      • Cesky genetic history
    • Chinook
    • Curly-coated Retriever
    • Doberman
    • Entelbucher Mountain Dog
    • Flatcoat Retriever
    • French Bulldog
    • German Shorthair
    • Golden Retriever >
      • Golden Retriever Pedigree Charts
    • Irish Water Spaniel >
      • IWS (6 Nov 17)
    • Labrador Retriever
    • Manchester Terrier
    • Mongolian Bankhar >
      • Research Updates
      • Bankhar 1
    • Norwegian Lundehund
    • Plummer Terrier
    • Otterhound
    • Portuguese Water Dog >
      • Portuguese Water Dog (pt 2)
    • Ridgeback
    • Schipperke
    • Standard Poodle >
      • The Problem With Poodles
      • 3poodle pedigree charts
      • 3Poodle Wycliff dogs
      • Poodle Genetics
    • Tibetan Spaniel
    • Tibetan Mastiff
    • West Highland White Terrier
    • Whippet
    • Wirehaired Pointing Griffons
    • UK KC Graphs >
      • UK KC Breed Status
      • UK Groups
      • KC Gundogs
      • KC Hounds
      • KC Terriers >
        • Terriers (select breeds)
      • KC Pastoral
      • KC Toys
      • KC Working
      • KC Utility
      • Australian KC
    • Breed outcrossing programs
  • Resources
    • Genetics Databases
    • Stud Books >
      • American Kennel Club stud books
      • Field Dog stud books
      • The Kennel Club (UK)
    • Learn
    • Videos about dog genetics
    • The Amazing Things Dogs Do! (videos) >
      • Livestock Management
      • Livestock guarding
      • Transportation, exploration, racing
      • Conservation & wildlife management
      • Detection Dogs
      • Medicine & Research
      • Entertainment
      • AKC/CHF Podcasts
    • Read & Watch
    • Bookshelf

Inbreeding of purebred dogs determined from DNA

12/25/2016

 
By Carol Beuchat PhD
A new study in press (Dreger et al 2016) reports heterozygosity (inbreeding) for 112 dog breeds, determined several different ways. They computed inbreeding from pedigree data for 5, 10, and all generations in the database. They also determined genomic inbreeding using DNA analysis of SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) as well as whole genome analysis.
I have graphed the data for inbreeding (below) determined from DNA analysis (from their table S2). It is presented both alphabetically by breed (left) and by magnitude of the inbreeding coefficient (right). The lines indicate three levels of inbreeding: green is 6.25% (the result of mating first cousins), yellow is 12.5% (the result of mating half-sibs), and red is 25% (the result of a full-sib cross). For perspective, evidence of inbreeding depression in mammals (e.g., lower fertility, smaller litters, higher puppy mortality, shorter lifespan, etc) first appears at about 5% inbreeding, and the costs of inbreeding (including incresed expression of recessive mutations) usually outweigh the benefits above about 10%. (Read more about the costs and benefits of inbreeding.) Only the Sloughi is less than 6%, and the Chihuahua, Jack Russell Terrier, Tibetan Mastiff, and Spanish Water Dog are less than 12%. There are perhaps 20 breeds with inbreeding of less than 25%, and the rest are 25% or more.


​How well does inbreeding computed from pedigree data reflect actual heterozygosity determined from DNA? 

Pedigree estimates of inbreeding using all data usually underestimate genomic inbreeding, sometimes by a lot. (The pedigree estimate was greater only for the NS Duck Tolling Retriever.)
Picture

​The highest level of inbreeding by far (> 80%) is for the Norwegian Lundehund. This breed suffers from extremely low fertility and high puppy mortality as well as an often lethal gastrointestinal disorder. As a last effort to save it from extinction, it is now the focus of a cross-breeding program supported by the Norwegian Lundehund club and guided by an international group of scientists who are now reporting the successful production of F2 offspring.
Picture
Picture

Below are a few of the graphs from the study,which were produced from pedigree data of inbreeding from the beginning of available data to the present. The dashed vertial line shows when the breed was recognized to AKC. (Note that this is not necessarily the date the breed was originally founded.) For each, they depict inbreeding calculated using 5 generations (green), 10 generations (red), and all of the pedigree data (blue). As you would expect (I explain why here), inbreeding from only 5 and 10 generations of data underestimates the inbreeding determined using all generations of data available. In most cases, the magnitude of the error is substantial. (Note that the y-axes are scaled differently on each graph. Apologies for the poor quality of the pictures, where were all that was available in the pre-print of the paper.)
For the 6 figures below:
​Inbreeding computed from pedigree data for 5, 10, and all generations for (top to bottom): Papillon, Bernese Mountain Dog, Golden Retriever, Basenji, Norwich Terrier, and Nova Scotia Duck Tolling Retriever. With this ordering, the breed with the least current level of inbreeding is first, and the others follow in order of increasing magnitude (i.e., the highest current inbreeding computed from pedigree data is for the NS Duck Tolling Retriever). 
Picture

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture


​These data confirm that inbreeding of most purebred breeds is extremely high, with all but a handful of values exceeding the level of inbreeding produced by mating full siblings from unrelated parents.


Dreger DL, M Rimbault, BW Davis, A Bhatnagar, HG Parker, & EA Ostrander. 2016. Whole genome sequence, SNP chips and pedigree structure: building demographic profiles in domestic dog breeds to optimize genetic trait mapping. http://dmm.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/dmm.027037

Check out
ICB's online courses
​

*******************

Join our Facebook Group
ICB Breeding for the Future
...the science of dog breeding
*******************

Visit our Facebook Page
ICB Institute of Canine Biology
...the latest canine news and research


Comments are closed.

    Archives

    January 2030
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    July 2023
    April 2023
    November 2022
    July 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    December 2020
    January 2020
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    October 2017
    August 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    July 2013
    March 2013
    July 2012
    April 2012

    Categories

    All
    Behavior
    Border-collie
    Herding

Blog

News


About Us

Contact Us








Copyright © 2012-2017 Institute of Canine Biology
Picture
Picture