The Institute of Canine Biology
  • HOME
  • Blog
  • Breed Preservation
    • Breeding for the future >
      • BFF Breed Groups
    • Breed Status
    • The "Elevator Pitch"
    • What's in the Gene Pool?
    • What population genetics can tell us about a breed
    • What population genetics can tell you...Tollers & Heelers
    • How to use kinship data
    • Using EBVs to breed better dogs >
      • How population size affects inbreeding
      • EBV Examples
    • How to read a dendrogram
    • Global Pedigree Project >
      • The Database
    • Finding the genes without DNA
    • How to read a heat map
  • Courses
    • COI BootCamp (FREE!)
    • Basic Population Genetics (FREE)
    • Genetic rescue: the genetics of cross breeding (NEW!)
    • The Biology of Dogs (Open Reg )
    • Managing Genetics For the Future >
      • Managing Genetics For the Future Open Reg (Open Reg) >
        • Syllabus - Managing Genetics for the Future
    • Genetics of Behavior & Performance (Open Reg)
    • Strategies for Preservation Breeding (Open Reg)
    • DNA For Dog Breeders (May2025) >
      • DNA For Dog Breeders (Open Reg)
    • Understanding Hip & Elbow Dysplasia (Open Reg) >
      • MORE FREE COURSES >
        • Quickie Genetics (Free!)
        • Group Discounts
        • Useful Genetics (Free!)
        • Strategies for Preservation Breeding (Sept 2023) >
          • Heredity & Genetics (Free!)
        • Basic Genetics Videos
  • Health Data
    • Bloat (Purdue Study)
    • Body Condition Score >
      • % Dysplastic vs BCS
    • Breed Comparions
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Cataracts
    • Caesareans
    • Deafness
    • Degenerative Myelopathy
    • Elbow Dysplasia
    • Epilepsy
    • Genetic Diversity
    • Genetic Diversity (MyDogDNA)
    • Hip Dysplasia >
      • Hip Dysplasia (Hou et al 2013)
    • Metabolic
    • Inbreeding Effects
    • Inbreeding (Gubbels)
    • Inbreeding (Dreger)
    • Lifespan
    • Litter size
    • mtDNA
    • Orthopedic
    • Mode of Inheritance
    • Patella Luxation
    • Thyroid
    • Portosystemic shunt
    • Purebred vs Mixed (UC Davis)
    • Purebred vs Mixed Breed (Bonnett)
    • Spay & Neuter Effects
    • Calboli et al 2008
    • Hodgman (1963)
    • Scott & Fuller (1965)
    • Stockard: Purebred crosses
    • Summers (2011)
  • Projects
    • How To Interpret Breed Analyses
    • Afghan Hound
    • More details about the Toller study
    • Belgian Tervuren >
      • Belgian Terv p2
      • Belgians- why population size matters
    • Bernese Mountain Dog
    • Boxer
    • Brussels Griffon
    • Bullmastiff
    • Canaan Dog >
      • Canaan analyses
    • Cesky Terrier >
      • Cesky genetic history
    • Chinook
    • Curly-coated Retriever
    • Doberman
    • Entelbucher Mountain Dog
    • Flatcoat Retriever
    • French Bulldog
    • German Shorthair
    • Golden Retriever >
      • Golden Retriever Pedigree Charts
    • Irish Water Spaniel >
      • IWS (6 Nov 17)
    • Labrador Retriever
    • Manchester Terrier
    • Mongolian Bankhar >
      • Research Updates
      • Bankhar 1
    • Norwegian Lundehund
    • Plummer Terrier
    • Otterhound
    • Portuguese Water Dog >
      • Portuguese Water Dog (pt 2)
    • Ridgeback
    • Schipperke
    • Standard Poodle >
      • The Problem With Poodles
      • 3poodle pedigree charts
      • 3Poodle Wycliff dogs
      • Poodle Genetics
    • Tibetan Spaniel
    • Tibetan Mastiff
    • West Highland White Terrier
    • Whippet
    • Wirehaired Pointing Griffons
    • UK KC Graphs >
      • UK KC Breed Status
      • UK Groups
      • KC Gundogs
      • KC Hounds
      • KC Terriers >
        • Terriers (select breeds)
      • KC Pastoral
      • KC Toys
      • KC Working
      • KC Utility
      • Australian KC
    • Breed outcrossing programs
  • Resources
    • Genetics Databases
    • Stud Books >
      • American Kennel Club stud books
      • Field Dog stud books
      • The Kennel Club (UK)
    • Learn
    • Videos about dog genetics
    • The Amazing Things Dogs Do! (videos) >
      • Livestock Management
      • Livestock guarding
      • Transportation, exploration, racing
      • Conservation & wildlife management
      • Detection Dogs
      • Medicine & Research
      • Entertainment
      • AKC/CHF Podcasts
    • Read & Watch
    • Bookshelf

Coefficient of Inbreeding (COI 1.1)

Summary
​

​The text explores the concept of inbreeding, specifically focusing on its impact on dog breeding.  The text highlights both the benefits and drawbacks of inbreeding, explaining how it can lead to desired traits like uniformity and increased prepotency, but also cause serious problems such as reduced fertility, increased genetic disorders, and a decline in overall health. Inbreeding is a natural consequence of breeding in closed populations, which purebred dogs by definition belong to, as they are restricted to breeding within the breed.  The text emphasizes the importance of managing inbreeding in dog breeding programs to mitigate negative health consequences while still achieving desired breed traits.

Origins and Implications of the Coefficient of Inbreeding (COI)

​
The Coefficient of Inbreeding (COI), also known as "Wright's F", was developed by evolutionary geneticist Sewall Wright in the early 20th century. Wright, who worked for the US Department of Agriculture, sought to address the known effects of inbreeding in animal breeding programs.Even then, breeders understood that inbreeding resulted in:●

Advantages: increased uniformity, prepotency (the ability to pass traits to offspring), and the fixing of desirable traits and breed type●

Disadvantages: decreased vigor, fertility, and vitality, as well as an increase in uniformity within inbred stock.

​
Wright aimed to quantify these effects, believing that unfavorable, recessive Mendelian factors explained the decrease in vigor associated with inbreeding. He reasoned that recessive mutations, often linked to favorable dominant factors, accumulate over time and become more prevalent with increased homozygosity.

Therefore,
calculating the percentage of homozygosity resulting from specific mating systems would allow for the creation of a coefficient of inbreeding.

The COI is especially relevant to purebred dog breeding as closed stud books, by definition, create closed populations. This means that all purebred dog breeding is inherently a form of inbreeding as all individuals within a breed are related, descending from a limited number of founders.While inbreeding can help breeders achieve desired traits, it also unavoidably increases the risk of genetic disorders.

The smaller the effective population size - a statistical estimate of the "genetic" population size (which is almost always less than the actual number of breeding animals) - the faster inbreeding increases, making the population more vulnerable to extinction
. However, inbreeding can be managed through strategic breeding practices. \

Understanding and utilizing the COI, alongside other population genetics tools, can empower breeders to make informed decisions that prioritize both breed-specific traits and the long-term health of the gene pool
.

​Breeding Dogs: The Delicate Balance of InbreedingThis briefing document analyzes excerpts from "COI 1.1 The good and bad of inbreeding.pdf" to provide insights into the complex relationship between inbreeding and dog breeding.
Main Themes:
  1. The Dual Nature of Inbreeding: Inbreeding presents a double-edged sword for breeders. It offers valuable advantages such as:
  • Increased Uniformity: Breeding related individuals promotes consistency in desired physical traits and breed type.
  • Enhanced Prepotency: Inbred animals have a higher probability of passing on specific traits to their offspring.
  • Trait Fixation: Inbreeding helps "fix" desired traits, ensuring their presence in future generations.
  1. However, these benefits come at a steep price. Inbreeding's disadvantages include:
  • Reduced Fertility and Vigor: Inbreeding can lead to smaller litter sizes, lower offspring survival rates, and reduced overall health.
  • Increased Genetic Disorders: Inbreeding raises the risk of expressing harmful recessive mutations, leading to a higher incidence of genetic diseases.
  • Diminished Genetic Potential: Inbreeding limits the gene pool, reducing the ability to adapt and improve traits over time.
  1. The Inevitability of Inbreeding in Closed Populations: Purebred dogs represent closed populations due to the restrictions imposed by stud books. Every dog within a breed shares ancestry, making inbreeding unavoidable. This leads to an inherent increase in inbreeding over time, potentially jeopardizing the breed's long-term health and survival.
  2. Managing Inbreeding for a Healthier Future: While inbreeding is unavoidable in purebred dog breeding, its negative impacts can be mitigated. Breeders can employ strategies to manage inbreeding and protect the genetic health of their breeds:
  • Understanding the Coefficient of Inbreeding (COI): The COI, developed by Sewall Wright, quantifies the level of inbreeding in an individual. Breeders can use this tool to make informed breeding decisions and minimize inbreeding.
  • Prioritizing Genetic Diversity: Breeders should aim to maintain a diverse gene pool by selecting breeding pairs with lower COIs and avoiding close relatives.
  • Utilizing Genetic Testing: DNA testing can identify carriers of harmful recessive mutations, allowing breeders to avoid pairings that risk producing affected offspring.
Key Ideas & Facts:
  • Genetic Basis of Inbreeding's Effects: Inbreeding increases homozygosity, meaning individuals inherit identical copies of genes from both parents. This elevates the chances of expressing harmful recessive mutations, leading to genetic disorders. As Sewall Wright noted, "injurious dominant mutations will be relatively promptly weeded out, leaving the recessive ones to accumulate."
  • Impact of Effective Population Size: Even in large populations, if only a small number of individuals breed, the "effective population size" shrinks, accelerating the rate of inbreeding. This is a critical concern in many dog breeds where breeding is concentrated within a limited number of dogs.
  • Analogy to Wild Populations: In natural settings, most animals avoid mating with relatives to maintain genetic diversity. Closed populations, like those on islands, experience unavoidable inbreeding, often leading to negative consequences. Purebred dog breeds mirror this situation.
Quotes:
  • "inbreeding in a closed gene pool increases genetic homozygosity, and homozygosity results in increased expression of traits caused by recessive alleles."
  • "Animals in closed populations eventually, inevitably go extinct as the quality of the gene pool declines."
  • "But inbreeding can be managed by breeders who consider the health of the gene pool as well as the quality of the next litter in their breeding plans."
Conclusion:
The excerpts highlight the critical need for breeders to understand and actively manage inbreeding. By utilizing tools like COI calculations and genetic testing, breeders can balance the pursuit of desirable traits with the preservation of genetic diversity and the long-term health of their breeds.

Blog

News


About Us

Contact Us








Copyright © 2012-2017 Institute of Canine Biology
Picture
Picture