The Institute of Canine Biology
  • HOME
  • Blog
  • Breed Preservation
    • Breed Status
    • Breeding for the future >
      • BFF Breed Groups
    • The "Elevator Pitch"
    • What's in the Gene Pool?
    • The Pox of Popular Sires
    • What population genetics can tell us about a breed
    • What population genetics can tell you...Tollers & Heelers >
      • More details about the Toller study
    • How population size affects inbreeding
    • Finding the genes without DNA
    • Global Pedigree Project >
      • The Database
    • How to use kinship data
    • Using EBVs to breed better dogs >
      • EBV Examples
    • How to read a dendrogram
  • Projects
    • How To Interpret Breed Analyses
    • Afghan Hound
    • Belgian Tervuren >
      • Belgian Terv p2
      • Belgians- why population size matters
    • Bernese Mountain Dog
    • Boxer
    • Canaan Dog >
      • Canaan analyses
    • Cesky Terrier >
      • Cesky genetic history
    • Chinook
    • Curly-coated Retriever
    • Doberman
    • Entelbucher Mountain Dog
    • Flatcoat Retriever
    • French Bulldog
    • German Shorthair
    • Golden Retriever >
      • Golden Retriever Pedigree Charts
    • Irish Water Spaniel >
      • IWS (6 Nov 17)
    • Manchester Terrier
    • Mongolian Bankhar >
      • Research Updates
      • Bankhar 1
    • Norwegian Lundehund
    • Plummer Terrier
    • Otterhound
    • Portuguese Water Dog >
      • Portuguese Water Dog (pt 2)
    • Ridgeback
    • Schipperke
    • Standard Poodle >
      • The Problem With Poodles
      • 3poodle pedigree charts
      • 3Poodle Wycliff dogs
      • Poodle Genetics
    • Tibetan Mastiff
    • West Highland White Terrier
    • Whippet
    • Wirehaired Pointing Griffons
    • UK KC Graphs >
      • UK KC Breed Status
      • UK Groups
      • KC Gundogs
      • KC Hounds
      • KC Terriers >
        • Terriers (select breeds)
      • KC Pastoral
      • KC Toys
      • KC Working
      • KC Utility
      • Australian KC
    • Breed outcrossing programs
  • Courses
    • The Biology of Dogs
    • Basic Population Genetics for Dog Breeders
    • Managing Genetics for the Future >
      • Syllabus - Managing Genetics for the Future
    • DNA For Dog Breeders >
      • Syllabus - DNA for Dog Breeders
    • Genetics of Behavior & Performance >
      • Syllabus - Genetics Behavior & Performance
    • Understanding Hip & Elbow Dysplasia
    • Genetics for Preservation Breeders
    • Seminar - What's a Popular Sire?
    • FREE COURSES >
      • Quickie Genetics (Free!)
      • Heredity & Genetics (Free!)
      • Useful Genetics (Free!)
      • COI BootCamp (Free!) >
        • COI Bootcamp Graduates
  • Health Data
    • Genetic disorders by Breed
    • UK KC 2004 Survey
    • Bloat (Purdue Study)
    • Body Condition Score >
      • % Dysplastic vs BCS
    • Breed Comparions
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Cataracts
    • Caesareans
    • Deafness
    • Degenerative Myelopathy
    • Elbow Dysplasia
    • Epilepsy
    • Genetic Diversity
    • Genetic Diversity (MyDogDNA)
    • Hip Dysplasia >
      • Hip Dysplasia (Hou et al 2013)
    • Inbreeding Effects
    • Inbreeding (Gubbels)
    • Inbreeding (Dreger)
    • Lifespan
    • Litter size
    • Metabolic
    • mtDNA
    • Orthopedic
    • Mode of Inheritance
    • Patella Luxation
    • Thyroid
    • Portosystemic shunt
    • Purebred vs Mixed (UC Davis)
    • Purebred vs Mixed Breed (Bonnett)
    • Spay & Neuter Effects
    • Calboli et al 2008
    • Hodgman (1963)
    • Scott & Fuller (1965)
    • Stockard: Purebred crosses
    • Summers (2011)
  • Resources
    • Genetics Databases
    • Stud Books >
      • American Kennel Club stud books
      • Field Dog stud books
      • The Kennel Club (UK)
    • Learn
    • Videos about dog genetics
    • The Amazing Things Dogs Do! (videos) >
      • Livestock Management
      • Livestock guarding
      • Transportation, exploration, racing
      • Conservation & wildlife management
      • Detection Dogs
      • Medicine & Research
      • Entertainment
    • AKC/CHF Podcasts
    • Bookshelf
    • Read & Watch
  • About Us
    • Contact
    • Carol Beuchat, PhD
    • Robert Lacy, PhD
    • Peer Berg, PhD
    • Thomas Famula, PhD
    • Heather Huson, PhD
    • Iwona Glazewska, PhD
    • Will Ludington, PhD
    • Claudia Melis, PhD
    • Jennifer Mickelberg, PhD
    • Torsten Nygaard Kristensen, PhD
    • Thomas Mitchell
    • Pieter Oliehoek, PhD
    • CA Sharp
    • Rory Todhunter, PhD
  • ICB Breeder Tool
  • DNA For Dog Breeders
  • Belgian Sheepdogs
  • New Page

Effects of Spay & Neuter

Data from -
  • Hart, BL, LA Hart, AP Thigpen, & NH Willits 2014  Long-term health effects of neutering dogs: comparison of Labrador Retrievers with Golden Retrievers.  PLoS ONE 9(7).  (pdf)
Authors' Abstract
Our recent study on the effects of neutering (including spaying) in Golden Retrievers in markedly increasing the incidence of two joint disorders and three cancers prompted this study and a comparison of Golden and Labrador Retrievers. Veterinary hospital records were examined over a 13-year period for the effects of neutering during specified age ranges: before 6 mo., and during 6-11 mo., year 1 or years 2 through 8. The joint disorders examined were hip dysplasia, cranial cruciate ligament tear and elbow dysplasia. The cancers examined were lymphosarcoma, hemangiosarcoma, mast cell tumor, and mammary cancer.

The results for the Golden Retriever were similar to the previous study, but there were notable differences between breeds. In Labrador Retrievers, where about 5 percent of gonadally intact males and females had one or more joint disorders, neutering at <6 mo. doubled the incidence of one or more joint disorders in both sexes. In male and female Golden Retrievers, with the same 5 percent rate of joint disorders in intact dogs, neutering at <6 mo. increased the incidence of a joint disorder to 4-5 times that of intact dogs.

The incidence of one or more cancers in female Labrador Retrievers increased slightly above the 3 percent level of intact females with neutering. In contrast, in female Golden Retrievers, with the same 3 percent rate of one or more cancers in intact females, neutering at all periods through 8 years of age increased the rate of at least one of the cancers by 3-4 times.

In male Golden and Labrador Retrievers neutering had relatively minor effects in increasing the occurrence of cancers. Comparisons of cancers in the two breeds suggest that the occurrence of cancers in female Golden Retrievers is a reflection of particular vulnerability to gonadal hormone removal.

  • NOTE: When this was originally posted, the summary below was inadvertently omitted.
  • NOTE: The tables containing the data used for the graphs are appended at the bottom.

SUMMARY
The results of this study indicate that for MOST of the traits and age categories, spay/neuter had NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT.  Bars with asterisks indicate an effect that is significantly different from the value for intact dogs.

For cancers:
* there was NO significant effect for either breed at all age classes for hemangiosarcoma, 
* there was NO significant effect for any cancer in Labradors.
* in Goldens there was ONLY a significant affect in females for mast cell tumor at 3 of 4 age classes
* for lymphosarcoma in Goldens, there was ONLY an effect in dogs neutered between 6-11 months.
 *** So in terms of an effect on incidence of cancer, it was sex- and breed-specific for mast cell tumor, and affected only ONE age class of Goldens for lymphosarcoma.

For the orthopedic traits:
* Goldens spay/neutered males had increased incidence of hip dysplasia in all classes except 1 yr.
* there was NO effect of spay/neuter on hip dysplasia in female goldens.
* there was NO effect of spay/neuter on elbow dysplasia in goldens
* there was an effect ONLY for Labradors neutered/spayed before 6 mos and between 2-8 years
* CCL problems were increased in both male and female Goldens in 3 of the 4 age categories (not significant for dogs S/N at 1 yr
* in Labradors, there was an effect ONLY in males neutered before 6 mos.
 *** For the orthopedic traits, S/N before 1 yr should be avoided.

These data do NOT scream "don't S/N".  For the majority of these measurements, it has no effect at all.  The data do certainly support the notion that dogs should be left intact until at least 1 y, as after that age the added risk for any of the things examined here is very low.

This study does indicate that there are some things worth further study - differences between breeds (Labs vs Goldens) in the response to S/N, including a potential effect of sex. 



* Asterisk above a bar indicates a statistically significant difference from the intact level.

Orthopedic Disorders
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

CANCER
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Blog

News


About Us

Contact Us








Copyright © 2012-2017 Institute of Canine Biology
Picture
Picture
✕