The Institute of Canine Biology
  • HOME
  • Blog
  • Breed Preservation
    • Breeding for the future >
      • BFF Breed Groups
    • Breed Status
    • The "Elevator Pitch"
    • What's in the Gene Pool?
    • What population genetics can tell us about a breed
    • What population genetics can tell you...Tollers & Heelers
    • How to use kinship data
    • Using EBVs to breed better dogs >
      • How population size affects inbreeding
      • EBV Examples
    • How to read a dendrogram
    • Global Pedigree Project >
      • The Database
    • Finding the genes without DNA
    • How to read a heat map
  • Courses
    • COI BootCamp (FREE!)
    • Basic Population Genetics (FREE)
    • Genetic rescue: the genetics of cross breeding (NEW!)
    • The Biology of Dogs (Open Reg )
    • Managing Genetics For the Future >
      • Managing Genetics For the Future Open Reg (Open Reg) >
        • Syllabus - Managing Genetics for the Future
    • Genetics of Behavior & Performance (Open Reg)
    • Strategies for Preservation Breeding (Open Reg)
    • DNA For Dog Breeders (May2025) >
      • DNA For Dog Breeders (Open Reg)
    • Understanding Hip & Elbow Dysplasia (Open Reg) >
      • MORE FREE COURSES >
        • Quickie Genetics (Free!)
        • Group Discounts
        • Useful Genetics (Free!)
        • Strategies for Preservation Breeding (Sept 2023) >
          • Heredity & Genetics (Free!)
        • Basic Genetics Videos
  • Health Data
    • Bloat (Purdue Study)
    • Body Condition Score >
      • % Dysplastic vs BCS
    • Breed Comparions
    • Cancer
    • Cardiac
    • Cataracts
    • Caesareans
    • Deafness
    • Degenerative Myelopathy
    • Elbow Dysplasia
    • Epilepsy
    • Genetic Diversity
    • Genetic Diversity (MyDogDNA)
    • Hip Dysplasia >
      • Hip Dysplasia (Hou et al 2013)
    • Metabolic
    • Inbreeding Effects
    • Inbreeding (Gubbels)
    • Inbreeding (Dreger)
    • Lifespan
    • Litter size
    • mtDNA
    • Orthopedic
    • Mode of Inheritance
    • Patella Luxation
    • Thyroid
    • Portosystemic shunt
    • Purebred vs Mixed (UC Davis)
    • Purebred vs Mixed Breed (Bonnett)
    • Spay & Neuter Effects
    • Calboli et al 2008
    • Hodgman (1963)
    • Scott & Fuller (1965)
    • Stockard: Purebred crosses
    • Summers (2011)
  • Projects
    • How To Interpret Breed Analyses
    • Afghan Hound
    • More details about the Toller study
    • Belgian Tervuren >
      • Belgian Terv p2
      • Belgians- why population size matters
    • Bernese Mountain Dog
    • Boxer
    • Brussels Griffon
    • Bullmastiff
    • Canaan Dog >
      • Canaan analyses
    • Cesky Terrier >
      • Cesky genetic history
    • Chinook
    • Curly-coated Retriever
    • Doberman
    • Entelbucher Mountain Dog
    • Flatcoat Retriever
    • French Bulldog
    • German Shorthair
    • Golden Retriever >
      • Golden Retriever Pedigree Charts
    • Irish Water Spaniel >
      • IWS (6 Nov 17)
    • Labrador Retriever
    • Manchester Terrier
    • Mongolian Bankhar >
      • Research Updates
      • Bankhar 1
    • Norwegian Lundehund
    • Plummer Terrier
    • Otterhound
    • Portuguese Water Dog >
      • Portuguese Water Dog (pt 2)
    • Ridgeback
    • Schipperke
    • Standard Poodle >
      • The Problem With Poodles
      • 3poodle pedigree charts
      • 3Poodle Wycliff dogs
      • Poodle Genetics
    • Tibetan Spaniel
    • Tibetan Mastiff
    • West Highland White Terrier
    • Whippet
    • Wirehaired Pointing Griffons
    • UK KC Graphs >
      • UK KC Breed Status
      • UK Groups
      • KC Gundogs
      • KC Hounds
      • KC Terriers >
        • Terriers (select breeds)
      • KC Pastoral
      • KC Toys
      • KC Working
      • KC Utility
      • Australian KC
    • Breed outcrossing programs
  • Resources
    • Genetics Databases
    • Stud Books >
      • American Kennel Club stud books
      • Field Dog stud books
      • The Kennel Club (UK)
    • Learn
    • Videos about dog genetics
    • The Amazing Things Dogs Do! (videos) >
      • Livestock Management
      • Livestock guarding
      • Transportation, exploration, racing
      • Conservation & wildlife management
      • Detection Dogs
      • Medicine & Research
      • Entertainment
      • AKC/CHF Podcasts
    • Read & Watch
    • Bookshelf

Understanding the heritability of behavior in dogs

6/30/2016

 
By Carol Beuchat PhD
In all animals, traits are altered from one generation to the next by natural or artificial selection. Genes for beneficial traits are preferentially passed on to offspring, while genes for detrimental traits are not. Over many generations, these gradual changes in gene frequency can add up to produce dramatic changes in size, shape, and behavior, and there is no better example of this than in dogs. 
How did the wolf, which has no special affection for humans, become our partner in work and life? ​The thing that sets dogs apart from any other animal is their remarkable ability to get along with people. In many ways they seem so like us, and in their boundless capacity for unconditional love and forgiveness they are often the person we wish we could be. 
Dogs are the way they are because we have selected for the specific behavioral traits that make them useful to us as working dogs, protection, and companions. In some cases, we have modified innate behaviors such as the prey drive to produce a dog that stalks but does not attack, or attacks but does not kill. This was accomplished over thousands of generations, not in tightly structured breeding programs, but by breeding the dogs that got the job done and culling the ones that didn't.
Picture
Although some of the goals have changed with the times, selection for behavioral traits is still at the core of most breeding programs. But anybody who has tried it can tell you that producing dogs that will display the behaviors you want isn't easy. A highly motivated working dog can produce a slacker, and a sweet tempered companion dog can produce one that is snappy and ill-tempered. Careful selection does not always produce what the breeder expects. The reason, of course, is that most behavior is complex and reflects not only the expression of many genes but also the influence of environmental factors. Understanding the dual contributions of genetics and environment to behavior is the crux of the debate about "nature vs nurture".
In fact, most behavior is a product of both nature and nurture; both genes and environment affect behavior. Efficient selection for desired behavior requires an understanding of the relative roles of genes and environment. The tool we can use to do this is a concept called "heritability".

​There is much misunderstanding about the meaning of heritability and, although heritability plays a key role in selection programs in other domestic animals, it has not been widely used by the dog fancy. This is unfortunate, because a breeder that understands heritability can substantially improve the efficiency of selection in their breeding program, not just for behavior but for any trait that is affected by both genetics and environment (e.g, hip dysplasia, obesity).

So, what is heritability?
The word itself suggests that it has something to do with genetics, and indeed it does, but probably not in the way you think.

​Here is a formal definition of heritability:

Heritability is the fraction of the variation in phenotype of a trait that is accounted for by the variation in genotype.

Phenotype is simply the expression of a trait, whether it be behavior, anatomy, function, or whatever. Genotype is the genetic makeup of the animal. So for example, if we are talking about the heritability of aggression in dogs, we are addressing how much of the variation in aggression from dog to dog can be attributed to variations among them in genotype.
Picture
By extension, the variation in the trait that is not accounted for by differences in genes is a consequence of non-genetic factors, which we collectively refer to as "environment". Environment includes not just things like temperature and physical environment, but also things like food, sound, exercise, toys - pretty much everything else you can think of that is not genetic.

The key words here are phenotype, genotype, environment, and variation. Note that we cannot discuss the variation in a trait if we are considering just a single animal.
To assess heritability, we need to document the variation in phenotype in a group of animals. Therefore, heritability is a property of a population, not of a trait. 
This is where most people get tripped up by the meaning of heritability. Let's try to clarify by looking at some of the common misunderstandings about heritability.

Heritability Misconceptions
Misconception 1. "A heritability of 0.25 means that 25% of a trait is determined by genetics".

I'm sure you have heard this one. Look back at the definition of heritability that we stated above:

​"Heritability is the fraction of the variation in phenotype of a trait that is accounted for by variation in genotype.

Heritability is about the variation in a trait from animal to animal, not the expression of the trait itself. If the heritability of a trait is 0.25 (or we can say 25%), that means that 25% of the variation in the trait in a group of animals can be attributed to variation in their genes. By extension, we can also say that 75% of the variation in our group of animals is the result of variation in environment - factors other than genetics.

Misconception 2. "A low heritability means that traits are not determined by genes."
​
Again, go back to our definition of heritability. A low heritability means that only a small amount of the variation in a trait in a group of individuals is a result of variation in their genes. If heritability is greater than 0, then genes do have some effect on the expression of the trait. It might be small, but at least some of the variation is due to genes.

But here's something tricky: a heritability of zero could either be because a trait is not affected by genes at all (e.g., the color of the shirt you're wearing today), or there is no variation in the trait and therefore none in the genes involved. For instance, the vast majority of people have five fingers on each hand. Having five fingers is definitely genetic, but the heritability of "number of fingers" is zero because there is no variation in either the trait or in the genes for the trait. And of course, you don't have a gene for "red shirt on Tuesday", although your choice might reflect the fact that red is especially attractive to you when you're stressed (genes), and you happened to have a red shirt (environment).

Likewise, if there are no environmental effects on the expression of a trait that varies among individuals, then the heritability will be equal to one: all of the variation in the phenotype of the trait can be accounted for by variations in the genes in each individual.

Misconception 3. "Heritability is a fixed value for a particular trait".
For the reason why this is not true, look again at the definition. Heritability refers to the fraction of phenotypic variation that can be attributed to genes vs environment. For example, body weight is influenced by genes that affect size, but it is also affected by food consumption and amount of exercise. The offspring of small dogs will tend to be small because of genetics, but dogs that are fed more and get less exercise will probably weigh more than ones that don't. The phenotype (body weight) will vary from individual to individual, and some portion of that variation will be a consequence of genes and the remainder will be due to environment. Consequently, the heritability of body weight in one group of dogs can be very high (if the environment and food are the same for all the dogs) or it can be low (if dogs eat as much as they want and have both a large play area and sofa). 

This is a key point: Heritability is not a fixed number for a trait. It reflects the relative contribution of genetics to the variation in a trait. If the variation in the trait is high because of variation in environmental factors, then the heritability in that population at that time will be low. 

You're probably still a bit confused about this heritability thing. It's definitely tricky, and I have a few examples of genetics textbooks that get it wrong! But have a look at these two videos, which I think do a good job of explaining heritability in the context of behavior using a few simple examples. Afterwards, I'll tell you about "the kicker" - the thing that makes heritability so important for breeders to understand.


"The Kicker"
​
​How important is it for breeders to understand all this nonsense about heritability? Very, and I'll tell you why.

Improving (or removing) a trait involves selecting those individuals that have the genes for the trait you want (or don't). Since we usually have no idea what the genes are that are involved in complex traits, we make selections based on phenotype - the expression of that trait. We assume that dogs that have the trait we want also have the genes we want and will pass them to their offspring. But is this assumption true? Maybe not.
If the heritability of a trait is high, then phenotype will be a good reflection of genotype. The variation in the trait in a group of animals will reflect the variation in the genes they inherited for a trait. Choosing dogs with the best phenotype will also be choosing the dogs with the best genotype.

But if heritability of a trait in a population is low, then the phenotype of the trait will not be a good reflection of genotype. A dog with high levels of aggression might have the genes for low aggression, but poor socialization or some bad experiences early in life have had a large, negative effect on the expression of that trait. That is, a dog with good genes can display a bad phenotype.

But you are only using phenotype to select the best breeding candidates; you don't know what genes they have. You are counting on your ability to pick the dogs with the genes you want based on your assessment of phenotype. If variation in phenotype doesn't accurately reflect differences in genotype, you won't be very good at identifying the best dogs to use (or not) in your breeding program. 
Picture
Now think about this. You are selecting for temperament. You don't breed animals with bad temperaments. But the heritability of most aspects of temperament is relatively low, because differences among dogs can reflect a variety of environmental factors you have no control over or even know anything about. You could be removing dogs from the gene pool that have the genes for good temperament but had bad experiences as a puppy.

If you're a dog breeder, this is clearly a problem. If heritability is low, phenotype is not telling you what you need to know about genotype. What can you do about this?

The simplest thing to do is evaluate additional animals that have similar genotypes, such as parents, siblings, and offspring. If related dogs don't have the temperament you want, it is unlikely that they have the genes you want either. Similarly, if good temperaments are common among related dogs, then a dog is likely to have good genes even though the expression of the trait in that dog isn't as good as you would like.

This isn't an argument to breed dogs with bad temperaments. Rather, it's a reason to try to get the best possible assessment of the genotype of a dog by considering the phenotypes of closely related dogs as well. This is one of those "baby-and-bathwater" things. Don't toss out the important thing (the genes) because of dirty bathwater. (Perhaps you have heard of "estimated breeding values" (EBVs). This is a statistical way to get a better assessment of the genotype of a dog by including information about the trait in related dogs.)

You can see that if you want to improve traits through selective breeding, it's important for you to know the heritability of the traits you are trying to select for (or against). If heritability is high, you will do a better job of choosing the dogs with the genes you want based on their phenotype. If heritability is low, phenotype will less accurately reflect genotype, and it will be harder to determine which dogs have the genes you want.

You can improve the efficiency of selection in your breeding program by doing things that will increase heritability of the traits of interest. For example, you can assess the trait under conditions that are as similar as possible for all the candidate dogs. This will reduce the amount of variation in the trait that is due to differences in environment, and higher heritability means that phenotype will be a better predictor of genotype. Evaluate an entire litter at the same time in the same place. Test all of the candidate bomb-sniffing dogs under carefully controlled conditions. Assess herding behavior of working dogs using the same herd and under conditions that are as similar as possible. By reducing environmental effects, what you see will more accurately reflect genotype.
Think about the traits you select for in your breeding program, learn about their heritabilities, and use this information to improve the efficiency of your breeding program.


To learn more about the genetics of dogs, check out
ICB's online courses

***************************************

Visit our Facebook Groups

ICB Institute of Canine Biology
...the latest canine news and research

ICB Breeding for the Future
...the science of animal breeding

Are we watching the extinction of a breed? (part 2)

6/5/2016

 
By Carol Beuchat PhD
To understand the rest of this, you need to read the blog I posted yesterday, so if you missed it you need to click on the link and read it now. I'll wait here for you. 

Are we watching the extinction of a breed?
Quite a downer, wasn't it? When I posted it I expected to receive a fusillade of abuse from "responsible" breeders. But I didn't. I got these, from people in Dobermans as well as other breeds:

I've always loved the look of Dobes but couldn't own one due to the health issues. I've known people who did everything right, dogs tested clear for heart issues for years but then finally popped for a heart issue later in life after being bred. I could never have that on my mind.

​This don't come out of the blue.....maybe now it is a eye opener for the ones who follow the herd and think it's the right path......Thank you for sharing this, still it makes you sad.....but sometimes the truth does that . Time will tell....there is less, I know.
We lost our last Dobe with DCM. He dropped dead in the hall. He was only 7. I had heard of DCM but didn’t realise it was so prevalent in the breed.
Picture

Excellent and crystal clear indeed. One is left wondering why breeders don't get it.

 IMO...........EVERY member here needs to read this! Every word is quite simply a fact! TY to Carol Beauchat for the courage to speak with such honesty.

This. This. A Thousand Times This!!

Thank you, THANK YOU, Dr. Beuchat!

The Doberman breed is in Dire straits, a fact increasingly evident over the last several decades. The most tragic part of it all is that this perfect breed, that stands ready to literally lay their lives down on the line to protect and serve us, is so indefensibly disserved by "breeders"  including more than a few of whom **knowingly choose to use dogs already diagnosed with occult DCM** for breeding.

The newly coined term "preservation breeders" is the most vacuous, jackass, hypocritical, Doberman-disserving one of all: these people largely are the very ones addressed in your writing, those suctioned onto the grand Show Win at ALL COSTS and wholly dismissive of the FACTS you presented. Their Dobermans are mere tokens in their personal subway car crusades to ego fulfillment and self-aggrandizement. (But, their dogs ears are ALL cropped, which is what counts, after all, in serving and saving our breed, of course.)

Thank you, I hope what you wrote will be widely shared. And I hope and pray there are enough individuals who GENUINELY care about the Doberman breed, able and willing to do what it takes to GENUINELY preserve its very existence.

We have identified 2 genes that contribute to DCM and can be tested for. However, there are like 18 more to go and 2 took a hundred years. While a majority of dobes carry DCM not all die from it. Boxers about equal with us for DCM.

I need this in a PDF like yesterday.

Although this article uses the Doberman breed as an example it is so important for all dog lovers and breeders..here is a chilling excerpt..."Here is the elephant in the room. Our dogs are dying of inbreeding. Decades of inbreeding in a quest for the ever more perfect dog has resulted in the loss of genes that are essential to life. However perfect and beautiful the dogs might be on the outside, on the inside they are broken".

This really moved me today...I have shared with some of the dobermann community.

We lost our Doberman (a rescue) at the early age of 2 to sudden onset DCM. It was heartbreaking. I am aware of some pretty nasty happenings amongst breeders in the dobe show world. It's really sad.

It is time to open the studbooks. Actually, it is long overdue.

 I had a Doberman years ago. Lived to the ripe old age of 2. She died from having seizure after seizure. My parents, 700 miles away at the same time had a Doberman (from a show dog breeder) also die at age 2 from Bone cancer. Scary.

Carol Beuchat thanks for standing up and speaking so concisely about this. Truth.

This is an article that every breeder should read. I no longer believe <X> breed can be saved. I no longer even want it to, at least in the manner in which breeders have been going. I don't believe this new test will matter in the long run, and by long run I don't mean 50 years, but 20 years from now. I cannot any longer feel as if the dogs can wait for that better future where <this disease> does not torment them. This breed is broken. All we can do is keep it propped up. No dog should be created to live this way. Although this article focuses on Dobermans, the X is also in trouble and the points made in this article need to be taken in and deeply considered as they pertain to all pure breed dogs. Thank you Carol Beuchat for speaking out plainly.

Wow. That poor man. Couldn't imagine going through such a thing. Thanks for the article. Something has to give :(

Acctually its interesting... and sad at the same time... there is no way to reduce inbreeding since the doberman originates from 7 Dogs.... there are NO free lines of DCM left.... its like Russian Rullet to breed as sad as it is. The Germans will never let a nother breed be crossed to the Doberman since they still are in denial that DCM exsists and many breeders do the US Gene test and if it sais its free they say there line is DCM free but thats not true.... i have seen resluts of a free testing and 3 weeks later that dog droped dead on DCM. So is our beloved breed doomed to be extinct? I am hoping its not but if you look at the scary facts... it is and it breaks my heart into a million pieces...

Heartbreaking to watch. I don't understand how a breeder can claim they love their breed and not outcross to save it

Yet breeders just keep on inbreeding and not heeding these warnings. They know better, and they have been breeding that way for years without a problem :-(. Maybe Dobermann breeders have reduced the incidence of Von Willebrands by testing but where has it got them.

I have had so many breeders who claim to be all about health, and who expressed a lot of interest in a new (evidence based) way to breed, but almost ALL of them fell away once it became clear that such an approach might not work well with the dogs (and plans) they now have. Very frustrating. Young breeders who have a good understanding of genetics and who have not yet invested a lot of money (and years and emotions) into breeding stock seem to be our highest and best hope. Crossing my fingers ..​.

Very good article and sadly I can't name one breeder I think would be open to breed crossing.

I have both breeds, in dobes 51% of the breed carries DCM worldwide. 30% of that 51% dies from sudden death. Very sad.

Not funny, it does matter.

We're on the brink, Carol Beuchat, thanks to your pushes and shoves. And we are finally getting a significant number of breeders who are interested in participating. :) More to come ...

Oh dear dogs.

Horrifying. My breed is less than one percent more diverse than Dobes, although we are blessed to not have a lethal condition like DCM. Yet. We need to act now, before it appears.

This is why we decided to have a crossbred dog. We thought about getting a vizsla, and we got a vizsla cross. When he was a few years old, polymyositis popped up in pure-bred vizslas. Thankfully it's not widespread in the breed, but it pretty much guarantees that we'll never be getting a vizsla. In fact, I doubt we'll ever have a pure-bred dog, much as we like the look, attitude, intelligence and drive of some of them.

I am literally sick to my stomach.

Irish Wolfhounds are 10 to the left of Dobermans in the chart. This is of Great concern. We need to spend the time, effort, knowledge, diversity, love, and open mindedness to enhance and ensure our wonderful breed for the future as well. We must stop being such purist and snobs and bring more animals into the tight circle we have created in order to save our hounds. I noticed this right away when I saw a majority of the dogs in the puppy pictures have cute socks on their front paws. Maked me wonder right away and this is just one indicator.

Wow. That is scary and sad.

When there is a lack of a plan to address these issues .... individuals try to do what they can do independently. How to get more cooperation?... maybe the business sector can shed some light.

Thank you for the article. Of course very thought provoking and scary!! We are not breeders but love our flat coats. I hope the breeders read this and pass it on

Excellent info and a must read for all Boerboel enthusiasts!

To be fair, I will confess that there were a few folks that had something negative to say. I just have to share with you this gem offered by Robyn Dubbert:
The author may have a number of credentials but she's a misguided kook.
Now, she is not the first to call me a kook (but probably the first that intended it to be mocking and derisive). But misguided I am not. If I had posted that blog four years ago, I would be eyeballs deep in flung feces by now. To receive snarky comments from only this one person and a few others in that group that piled on reflects the huge progress that has been made in educating breeders and in raising awareness of inbreeding as a significant problem in dogs. Fortunately, Robyn, I am undeterred by your comments.
I want to share one more thing with you that was posted as a comment by Ruth Stolzewski in the ICB Breeding for the Future group.

"The Doberman doesn't die of inbreeding. It dies of human ignorance. This is the video I made for Doberman lovers in Germany 3 years ago: https://youtu.be/mL4wuv26068. And still the German Doberman club neglects the existence of the disease and does NOTHING to preserve it. And he does this under the roof of the German Kennel Club which calls itself the club with the strictest rules. Well what are rules worth if they are not enforced? The whole dog breeding world is just a false system in which human greed and ego comes first and the dog's well being comes last. That's the sad reality. And it does not change."

Go get a cup of tea and watch her moving video about the tragedy of DCM in Dobermans.
The familier themes are all there. Researchers studying the disorder. Geneticists searching for the gene. Acceptance by breeders that it's an unfortunate disorder in the breed, and even denial by the Kennel Club that there is any problem at all. You can be sure that for every death there are many hearts broken. In many cases the death of the dog left a loving owner with the mental image of a dog collapsing that they will never be able to "unsee".
Registrations of most purebred breeds have been dropping, but the decline in Dobermans is breathtaking. This graph is from the report compiled by the UK Kennel club and published on their website (you can download a copy below). After a burst of popularity in the 1980s, registrations crashed then seemed to settle down to about 3,000 per year. In the last 10 years, however, registrations have dropped like a rock. 

Picture
Is the breed becoming less popular because of its heart problems? It's hard to say, but it doesn't really matter. This is a breed in decline in terms of both health and numbers. Population explosions and crashes can destroy a gene pool. You have to appreciate that it takes careful planning to reduce a population of animals by a third, a half, or even more, without losing genetic diversity. So the Doberman breed needs cope with loss of genetic diversity because of a population crash, as well as additional losses due to genetic drift that will only increase as the population gets smaller. Inbreeding increases when there are fewer animals to breed from, which will increase the expression of deleterious alleles and loss of fitness through inbreeding depression. All of these are pushing the breed towards the cliff.
So, what now? If breeders are going to try to fix the health problems and save this breed, they better get started on it soon or there will be nothing left to save. They don't have time to bicker about whose fault it is, or which lines are worst and which might still be healthy. They need to make a plan, it needs to be global, and it needs to be sound.

​This is not a problem breeders or clubs will be able to solve themselves. This will be comparable to the rescue of a wildlife species in imminent danger of extinction. These kinds of rescues are very challenging under any circumstances, but rescue of the Doberman will take this to another level of difficulty. Real animal populations get sucked into the "extinction vortex" as inbreeding increases above about 10% because of low fertility, poor health, and short lifespans. Endangered species don't usually hang on until the level of inbreeding is 40% or 50% and a good fraction of the population is dropping dead before they are old enough to breed.

Breeders will need some serious expertise to help them fix this. It's going to take a lot of time, a lot of effort, and a lot of money to turn this boat around. Don't waste time worrying about what should be done and how to do it. Call in the doctor and get busy building a long-term plan. The longer you wait to get started, the harder it will be, because inbreeding will continue to increase and more and more of the gene pool will be lost. And, of course, more Doberman owners will experience the anguish of losing a beloved member of the family to a known genetic disorder.
This should have been addressed decades ago. But the awareness is there now, so now is the time to start.
​
Headed down the same tragic road of with rising rates of dilated cardiomyopathy are Deerhounds, Irish Wolfhounds, Boxers, St. Bernards, Great Danes, Afghans, Newfoundlands, Old English Sheepdogs, and English and American Cockers. They will all need to deal with this. Perhaps they should consider pooling resources and tackle this together.
Below you can download the report on the Doberman published in September 2015 by the UK Kennel club.
dobermann.pdf
File Size: 690 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File


Don't miss a post - subscribe to our blog!

To learn more about the genetics of dogs, check out
ICB's online courses

***************************************

Visit our Facebook Groups

ICB Institute of Canine Biology
...the latest canine news and research

ICB Breeding for the Future
...the science of animal breeding
​

Are we watching the extinction of a breed? (or, Why are we focused on consequence instead of cause?)

6/3/2016

 
By Carol Beuchat PhD
When I sat down at my desk this morning ready to tackle the tasks of the day, I did my usual quick scroll through my Facebook timeline. Right away, I ran into this video of a game of fetch with a Doberman. You need to watch this to the end.

​Then just a few posts down there was this.
Picture
I don't know these dogs and I don't know these people, but my heart breaks for them. I've set aside what I planned to do today to tell you what I think about this.

The dogs we love are dying. Biologists can tell you why this is happening, and in fact even animal breeders 100 years ago could have told you why this is happening. I've written dozens of blog posts on the ICB website explaining why this is happening.

Inbreeding affects health. At low levels of inbreeding, say 5% to 10%, there are effects on fertility, litter size, puppy mortality, and "vigor". There are also increases in the number of genetic disorders. The higher the level of inbreeding, the more negative the effects.

This is not folklore. This is fundamental, basic genetics. Inbreeding increases the expression of genetic disorders and has a negative effect on health in general. These are facts. If somebody is trying to convince you otherwise, you need to find a different mentor.

Inbreeding is necessary to fix type and improve consistency in domestic animals. This is how the breeds were created. These benefits can be appreciated at levels of inbreeding less than 10%.

Among purebred, recognized dog breeds, type was fixed long ago. The Dobermans above might not win in the ring, but they are recognizably Dobermans.

Here is the elephant in the room. Our dogs are dying of inbreeding. Decades of inbreeding in a quest for the ever more perfect dog has resulted in the loss of genes that are essential to life. However perfect and beautiful the dogs might be on the outside, on the inside they are broken.

What are we doing about this? We seem to be doing a lot. There are research studies, DNA tests, health seminars, disorder-specific Facebook groups, and so on.

But our dogs are dying of inbreeding. None of the things we are doing will cure inbreeding. Scientists can't cure inbreeding. Inbreeding must be cured by breeders.

I founded ICB four years ago because there was an increasing number of research papers being published about the negative effects of inbreeding on the health of dogs, but breeders didn't seem to be getting the message. There was really no place for breeders to go to get factual information, and they didn't have access to the resources and expertise they would need to address the growing problem. So ICB was born.

Four years on, thousands of students have taken ICB courses, but still it's just a trivial fraction of the number of breeders. A surprising number of ICB students are not breeders themselves, but are considering breeding in the future or are concerned about the growing health crisis in purebred dogs. For the most part, the "mainstream" breeders are not in these courses.

Perhaps this is why we seem to have settled into a standard approach in dealing with genetic disorders in dogs.

1) Dogs begin to turn up that suffer from some new disorder.

2) Breeders avoid breeding to dogs in the suspect lines.

3) Nevertheless, more dogs are afflicted and it becomes clear that the problem might be widespread.

4) Breeders acknowledge that there is a new genetic problem in the breed.

5) Breeders collect money and cheek swabs to initiate a research project to study the new disorder or to identify the faulty gene.

6) In the meantime, breeding continues and new cases continue to appear.

7) In the best case (but relatively rare) scenario, a single mutation is identified, a DNA test is developed, and a new test is added to the health screening list.

8) More often, a faulty gene is never identified, and study of the disorder does not offer useful insight into control measures.

9) The disorder is acknowledged as a "problem in the breed".

10) Breeding continues. Individual breeders adopt the strategies they believe will reduce their risk of producing affected animals (e.g., remove affected individuals and their close relatives from breeding; avoid breeding outside lines that are believed to be free of the problem). But nobody really knows what to do.


11) Eventually, a new problem will emerge and the cycle will repeat.

(Note that I have left out the steps for rumors, finger-pointing, witch-hunting, and blame.)


​To the breeders, celebrity psychologist Dr Phil would ask "And how's this been workin' for ya'?"

The honest answer is that it's not. 

What's the problem here? Breeders are looking to science for solutions to health problems, and the scientists study genetics and disease.

But the dogs are dying of inbreeding, and that is the problem we need to fix. We are focused on consequence when the solution lies in the cause. We are continuing to enjoy our cigarettes while we toss money at lung cancer research and assume that with hope, prayer, and patience things will get better. We are learning a lot about the problems that are caused by inbreeding, but we are not solving the problem.
Facebook posts like the ones at the beginning haunt me. The daily obituaries of dogs that died before their time clash with the proud announcements on Facebook about a young dog taking a five point major in stiff competition, or a dog achieving Grand Champion status, or a breeder-handler winning the group. Even more grating are the pronouncements about "responsible breeders" and more recently "preservation breeders". Dobermans are dropping dead of heart failure and have been for decades, while breeding continues. 

Look into the future. What scenario do you envision for how this will end?

​Science can help you with this. Doberman lover and scientist Dr Sonia Garcia Herdez put the information together to do a projection. Using published information about the frequency of DCM (dilated cardiomyopathy) in Dobermans, she created this nice graph of the known and projected frequency of the disease.
Picture
The graph shows that if we extrapolate from the past incidence rates into the future, by 2020 (that's four years from now!), 72% of European Dobermans will be afflicted with DCM. She provides the equation for the line, so I am able to do a bit of math and tell you that in 2039, essentially 100% of European Dobermans will have DCM. Anybody that breeds or loves Dobermans and is not already well into their sixties should be able to witness the sad extinction of this breed.
Can't we make this better through selective breeding? We don't seem to be making much progress so far, and the available genetic data paint a grim picture. Below is a graph based on DNA genotyping of Dobermans done by the Finnish company MyDogDNA (MDD). (I have compiled these graphs for all breeds for convenience here.)
Picture

​The graph is a frequency distribution of "heterozygosity". Heterozygosity is the fraction of loci in a dog's genome that have two different alleles. Inbreeding decreases heterozygosity; that is, inbreeding increases homozygosity, meaning both alleles are the same because an animal inherited the same allele from both parents. On the graph, the dogs with the lowest inbreeding are to the right and those with the highest inbreeding are to the left, indicated by the color scale from green to red under the graph. The orange line on this graph is for "all dogs" in their database and the green line is for a selection of similar breeds (pinschers, schnauzers, etc).

The blue line is for Dobermans and includes dogs from the US, UK, Finland, Russia, Australia, and Ukraine. The median level of heterozygosity reported by MDD for Dobermans is 27% (that should be close to the peak in the blue line). This is quite a bit lower than the median for all dogs, and it's even worse than the comparison population. 

​But is this really all that bad? Have a look at the graph below.

I have compiled the data for median heterozygosity of most of the breeds in the MDD database, and they are ranked here from worst (left) to best (right). The Doberman is indicated by the red arrow, well down in the rankings. (You can download a larger version of this graph below.)
Picture
_doberman-_mdd_genetic_diversity_by_rank_copy_3.png
File Size: 136 kb
File Type: png
Download File

Yes, this is bad. These data show that genetic diversity in Dobermans is extremely low. You can't improve a trait if there is no genetic variation in the population to select from. Genetic diversity in Dobermans is low and probably half the breed is afflicted with DCM. For Doberman lovers, I think there is much heartbreak in the future.
I've talked to a fair number of Doberman breeders about this. I even went to the Doberman National Specialty a few years ago to talk to more breeders. I found that most Doberman breeders love their breed with a passion, and for many people Dobermans are their life. I am convinced that breeders will continue to battle diligently against DCM until the last dog dies. But there is no solution to this problem in what we are already doing.
In A Christmas Carol, Scrooge is spirited into the future, where he sees how the consequences of his actions have affected many lives. The grim picture is enough to get him to change his ways and become a better man.

Unless there is some unanticipated scientific breakthrough, the future of the Doberman is grim. Dogs will continue to be snatched from life by sudden heart failure, and owners will continue to come home from work to find their dog dead on the floor. The Doberman DCM Facebook group will continue to grow. The Rainbow Bridge will widen to accommodate the souls of the dogs that are dying too young.
Picture
Above, I've presented you with the data. Here is where I am going to offer my opinion.

DNA testing does not make somebody a "responsible" breeder. Caring for the heritage of your breed does not make you a "preservation" breeder. Pride and love and dedication are all terrific, but they will not prevent the heartbreak that awaits thousands of Doberman owners in the future. Breeders need to DO something about this. Breeders need to step up to the plate and acknowledge that continuing to breed dogs that are likely to die of a genetic disorder is irresponsible, unethical, and inhumane. That is certainly how the average, everyday dog lover feels. This is also how I feel.
The Doberman was not created in its present form by a dog-loving God. It is a "blender" breed, created by a man who mixed a bit of this and a bit of that until he had the dogs he wanted. The breed was "recognized", the studbook closed, and the gene pool has been getting smaller ever since. Can the breed be saved by a cross-breeding program? Who knows, but certainly it is worth a try and there is little to lose. But time is running out.

How many of you just read the last paragraph and thought to yourselves "But breeders will never do it". Really? Not the "responsible" breeders? Not even the "preservation" breeders? Is there nobody who loves this breed enough to save it?

Go back and watch that video of the Doberman dropping dead in the middle of a game of fetch. Where are the breeders - those most devoted Doberman lovers - who will do something about this? This isn't my breed, but it's breaking my heart.

Postscript
If you're thinking that you're glad you aren't a Doberman breeder, you should have a look at the data for your own breed. There are unfortunately many breeds in which dedicated (responsible, preservation) breeders are likewise pursuing solutions by supporting research to study the health condition or searching for causative genes. Huge sums of money are being spent, breeders are becoming experts about esoteric veterinary disorders, and Facebook is burgeoned with groups for information, commiseration, and condolences.

But the path is the same, and the consequences probably are too. There is only one way to cure the diseases that result from inbreeding. Breeders are the only ones that can fix this. The problems have become obvious and undeniable in many breeds: Berners, Goldens, Flatcoats, Irish Water Spaniels, Cavaliers, Akitas, Dogue de Bordeaux, Bulldogs, Scotties, Westies, and the list goes on.

​There are a lot of breeds in trouble, with high inbreeding, low diversity, a growing list of genetic disorders, and plans to start another research study.

Science can learn about the problems caused by inbreeding, but the "cure" for inbreeding will have to come from the breeders. If you want to preserve your breed, this is the problem you need to address.

Go to Are we watching the extinction of a breed? (part 2)

Don't miss a post - subscribe to our blog!

To learn more about the genetics of dogs, check out
ICB's online courses

***************************************

Visit our Facebook Groups

ICB Institute of Canine Biology
...the latest canine news and research

ICB Breeding for the Future
...the science of animal breeding

    Archives

    January 2030
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    July 2023
    April 2023
    November 2022
    July 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    December 2020
    January 2020
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    October 2017
    August 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    July 2013
    March 2013
    July 2012
    April 2012

    Categories

    All
    Behavior
    Border-collie
    Herding

Blog

News


About Us

Contact Us








Copyright © 2012-2017 Institute of Canine Biology
Picture
Picture